Tag: Capsule

Posted on

Dripping, Buckling and Collapsing of a Droplet

The scale bar is 20 micron.

Original paper: Mechanical stability of particle-stabilized droplets under micropipette aspiration

 

Most of us have had the childhood experience of blowing bubbles. But have you ever wondered how bubbles form and what keeps them stable? The key to making bubbles is surface tension, the tension on the surface of a liquid that comes from the attractive forces between the liquid molecules.  Water has a very high surface tension (that’s why bugs can walk on water) making it difficult to stretch to form a thin water layer that we see when bubbles form. By adding soap to water, we can lower the surface tension of the water, allowing us to stretch this water-air interface to form a thin water sheet. As you blow more and more air into a bubble, the bubble will grow larger and larger as the thin layer stretches. Eventually, you’ll reach the limit of the added stretchiness, and the bubble will burst, engraving in your memory its fragile nature.

 

Fig1-1
A typical air bubble made out of a water-soap mixture (Figure courtesy of Gilad).

 

In soft matter, sometimes scientists utilize materials such as solid macroscopic particles instead of soap molecules to reduce the surface tension of an interface. Using particles to stabilize an interface allows them to tailor the mechanical and chemical properties of the interfaces to fabricate capsules. For instance, if a capsule needs to travel in blood-stream for therapeutic purposes, it must be tough enough to withstand blood pressure without rupturing. But if we make such a capsule how can we measure its mechanical response?

In this post, we’ll look into the work by Niveditha Samudrala and her colleagues on measuring the mechanical properties of a particle-stabilized interface. They utilize a direct approach of applying force on such a stabilized interface to study its mechanical response that has eluded earlier techniques. Knowing the stiffness of these particle-coated interfaces, say in the form of capsules, would enable us to use them for different controlled-release applications such as treating a narrowing artery [1] as well as tune them to have different flow properties. 

The authors use tiny (smaller than a micrometer!) dumbbell-shaped particles with different surface properties to stabilize an oil-in-water emulsion (see note [2]). Here instead of a thin layer of water sandwiched by the soap molecules, the water-oil interface has been stabilized with micron-sized particles. This stabilization technique will render higher mechanical properties to the interface. Droplets stabilized in this way, known as colloidosomes, have been shown to be capable of encapsulating a wide variety of molecules.

The researchers characterized the particle-stabilized droplets using the micropipette aspiration technique. To understand this technique, imagine picking an air bubble with a straw. What you need to do is to approach the air bubble and then apply a gentle suction (or aspiration) pressure. When the suction pressure becomes larger than the pressure outside of the droplet, then the droplet gets aspirated into the straw forming the aspiration tongue (Figure 1A). Similarly, in the micropipette aspiration technique, a glass pipette (the straw) with an inner diameter of $latex R_p$ is usually used to aspirate squishy stuff, such as cells, vesicles, and here droplets. 

To obtain the tension response, therefore the toughness of an aspirated interface, we need to consider the pressures applied to the interface. Let’s consider an aspirated droplet as shown in Fig 1A at mechanical equilibrium (which means the sum of all the forces is zero). We know that each interface has a surface tension acting on it (See Fig 2a). In our bubble example, I mentioned that the soap molecules tend to gather at such interface to decrease the tension (See Fig 2b). But when there are other forces acting on the interface in addition to the presence of the molecules, such as the suction pressure in our case, the tension of the interface now comes from both the surface tension and the suction force. We call this total force the interfacial tension (See Fig 2c). The Young-Laplace equation can be used to relate this interfacial tension to the pressure applied to the interface (Fig 1-B3). 

Fig1
Fig1. Schematic representation of the aspiration technique (A) and the Young-Laplace equations obtained at both interfaces of the outer edge of droplet and tongue inside the pipette (B). $latex P_{atm}$ is the atmospheric pressure set to zero, $latex P_{droplet}$ is the pressure inside the droplet. $latex P_{pip}$ is the suction pressure. $latex R_{v}$ is the radius of droplet outside the pipette and the $latex R_{p}$ is the pipette radius.

When the molecules, or particles in our case, are forced to pack tightly together they oppose the compression force. This opposition is felt at the interface by a pressure called surface pressure (see Fig 2c). Under the interface tension and the surface pressure, the new net interfacial tension is defined as:

$latex \tau=\gamma_{0} – \Pi$.

where $latex \Pi$ is the surface pressure, $latex \gamma_{0}$ is the interface tension which is constant for a given interface. 

In this study, Samudrala and her colleagues show that there are two critical pressures after which instabilities form at the interface resulting in droplet dripping into the pipette and buckling respectively (Fig 2d). They conclude that the dripping happens due to the transition of the interface from a particle-stabilized interface to a bare oil-water interface resulting in a sudden suction of tiny oil droplets (basically the droplet drips at this point, see Fig 3B, blue and 3C).

The second instability is the buckling which the researchers propose happens when $latex \tau$ tends to zero. Now let’s see how buckling happens.

interface
Fig 2. The schematic of a particle-stabilized water-oil interface under different load is shown. (a) shows the bare water-oil interface. This interface has a constant, material related surface tension, the $latex \gamma_{0}$. (b) depicts a particle-coated interface. The aggregation of the particles at the interface, decrease the interface tension to a new value of $latex \gamma$. (c) the particle-coated interface is compressed from both ends. This case happens in our case when the particle-coated droplet is stretched (see the text). (d) the compressed interface reaches a critical pressure upon which the net tension of the interface is zero and the buckling happens as the interface cannot no longer endure the imposed force.

The dripping at the first critical pressure decreases the volume of the particle-coated droplet, but note that the surface area is constant because neither particles leave the surface nor the free ones join the droplet (the latter argument is assumed). The continuation of the increase in suction pressure plus the volume lost in the dripping step results in the buckling of the interface (Fig 3b red and 3E, also see note [3]). When the authors aspirate the bare oil droplets as well as droplets stabilized by small molecules, they only see the sudden droplet disappearance with no shape abnormalities due to the fluid nature of the interface rather than solid-like nature for the particle-stabilized case. But why does the buckling happen? 

 

Screen Shot 2017-11-06 at 17.55.45
Fig 3. Evolution of instabilities of a particle-coated droplet under tension. (a) shows the schematics of the particle-coated droplet being aspirated. (b) Change in aspiration length as a function of suction pressure. Blue line remarks the capillary instabilities. Red line shows the elastic failure of buckling process. (c & d) are the images of capillary and buckling instabilities respectively. (e) shows the case when the suction pressure is above buckling pressure at which the particle coat fails (the figure is adapted with no further change from the original paper).

Recall how we defined the net interfacial tension above; $latex \tau=\gamma – \Pi$. The authors hypothesize that upon suction of a particle-stabilized droplet, particles jam at the interface of the droplet outside of the pipette, creating a high surface pressure. When this surface pressure approaches $latex \gamma$, the net tension becomes zero ($latex \tau=0$, see fig 2d and note how the interface tension is opposed by the surface pressure due to repulsion between particles). When an interface possesses no tension, it means that the interface can no longer bear any loads. Considering any sort of defects or irregularities due to nonuniform particle packing, for such interfaces deformations such as buckling will form. Now, let’s see how the authors test their hypothesis.

The authors observed that at the tip of the tongue, there is a very dilute packing of particles in such a way that the interface to a good approximation resembles the Fig 2a, a bare water-oil interface. With this observation, one can safely assume that the interfacial tension, the $latex \tau$ is equal to the oil/water interface tension, the $latex \gamma$ and write the Young-Laplace equation across the tip of the tongue (see Fig 1B-(1)): 

            $latex P_{droplet} – P_{pip} = \frac{2\gamma_{0}}{R_{p}}$

where $latex R_{p}$ is the radius of the pipette and is fixed. The authors experimentally show that for a range of droplet size ($latex 10\ \mu m < R_{droplet} < 100 \ \mu m$), the droplet pressure right before buckling varies very close to zero (in above equation all parameters are known except the $latex P_{droplet}$, which is calculated when we put $latex P_{pip} = P_{buckling}$). Therefore, considering the equation (2) in Fig 1B, the net tension would be zero (see note [3]) and with this, the authors correlate that the reason for the formation of buckling is the net-zero tension of the interface.

Taking it all together, we saw that for a droplet with solid-like thin shell, the mechanical response is completely different from the bare or the molecule-stabilized interface. A fairly rigid interface undergoes buckling due to its net tension tending to zero and knowing the threshold of buckling will enable us to tune the mechanical properties of such droplets for different applications from load-caused cargo release (see note [1]) or emulsions with varied flow properties. Imagine if we encapsulate a fragrance in our air bubble, which upon rupturing will release the scent. Now, wouldn’t it be nice if we could control the toughness of this bubble or similar architecture to rupture under a specific condition that we desire (see note [1])? 

 

[1] In a disease called atherosclerosis, the arteries narrow down due to plaque buildup. In this narrow region, the blood pressure is higher than the normal region of the artery. So one can use this pressure difference to crack release the relevant drug from the capsule only in the narrow regions of the artery to dissolve the plaques away. Neat!

[2] If we apply a shear force on a mixture of two or more immiscible liquids in the presence of a stabilizing agent, we produce an emulsion and the stabilizing agent is called an emulsifier. The particles show a significantly higher tendency to gather at an interface in comparison to amphiphilic molecules. Thus, particles are strong emulsifiers. If we mix lemon juice and oil, soon after stopping the mixing, the two solutions will separate. Now, if you add eggs, you stabilize this mixture (egg works as an emulsifier) and you get Mayonnaise!!

[3] The authors report that for particle-stabilized droplets they observed different deformation morphologies such as wrinkles, dimples, folds and in some case complete droplet failure. They attribute this diversity to the non-uniformity of particle packing at the interface. But what is interesting to me is when they decrease the suction pressure, the droplets go back to their original spherical shape and then upon the second aspiration, the deformations happen at the same exact location as were for the first aspiration. This means that during the suction, there is limited particle rearrangement (Watch here).

[4] We can easily set the atmosphere pressure to zero before aspirating the droplets, thus here the $latex P_{atm} = 0$.

Posted on

Brick-by-brick to Build Tiny Capsules

Original paper: Colloidosomes: Selectively Permeable Capsules Composed of Colloidal Particles

Disclosure: The first author of the article discussed in this post, Anthony Dinsmore, is now my Ph.D. advisor. He did his postdoc at Harvard University a while ago, and consequently, I was never involved in this work.

In past two decades, several approaches have been developed and optimized to encapsulate a wide variety of materials, from food to cosmetics and the more demanding realm of therapeutic reagents. Inspired by biological cells, the first attempts were to use either natural or synthetic lipid molecules to form encapsulation vessels, the so-called liposomes. Then, with the increasing awareness of controlled release of cargo, especially for therapeutic purposes, advanced materials such as polymers were developed to form carrying vessels. There has been an enormous progress in encapsulation technologies, however, these methods can be limited in their applicability regarding encapsulation efficacy, permeability, mechanical strength, and for biological applications, compatibility. In this article, Anthony Dinsmore and his colleagues introduce a new platform and structure to encapsulate almost all types of materials with finely controlled and tuned properties.

Colloidosomes

An emulsion is produced typically by application of a shear force to a mixture of two or more immiscible liquids like the classical water-oil mixture. The resulting solution is a dispersion of droplets of one liquid in the other continuous liquid. In such case, an interface between the fluids exists that would impose an energy penalty on the system. Therefore, the system will always attempt to minimize it, in essence by reducing the area of the interface that is to merge the similar liquid droplets. Amphiphilic molecules are known to segregate in such interface to further reduce the energy and to inhibit the merging of droplets.  This segregation is not limited solely to molecules though. Solid particles tend to jam in the interface for the same reason to stabilize the emulsions. Inspired by the idea of particle-stabilized emulsions, which are known as Pickering emulsions, Dinsmore, and his colleagues have developed capsules made of solid particles. They adopt the name “Colloidosomes” by analogy to liposomes and demonstrate how the arrangement of these particles can be manipulated and controlled to achieve a versatile encapsulation platform.

Fabricating the Capsules

Colloidosomes are prepared first by making the emulsion in which the continuous phase contains the particles. For instance, in water-in-oil emulsions (“w/o”), water droplets become the core of the colloidosomes and particles are dispersed in the oil phase. Gentle agitation of such system results in particles being trapped in the water-oil interface (see Fig.1). The authors summarize the capsule formation in three main steps:

 

Screen Shot 2017-10-17 at 01.01.10
Fig 1. The colloidosome formation process is illustrated schematically in three steps. (A) a water/oil emulsion first is created through gentle agitation of the mixture for several seconds. (B) Particles are adsorbed to the w/o interface to minimize the total surface energy. Through sintering, van der Waals forces, and or addition of polycations ultimately the particles are locked in the interface. (C)In the end, the particle-stabilized droplet is transferred to water via centrifugation.

(a)  Trapping and stabilization. When the water-oil interface energy surpasses the difference between particle-oil and particle-water interface energy, particles are absorbed to the water-oil interface and become trapped due to the presence of a strong attractive well. This differs substantially from the case where particles were adsorbed to the interface via electrostatics, which requires the droplets to be oppositely charged to attract the particles. The packing of the particles at the interface is adjusted by controlling their interactions. Typically, the electrostatic interaction between particles, due to their surface chemistry, is utilized to stabilize the packing of the particle. For instance, in this study particles are coated with a stabilizing layer which in contact with water turns into a negatively charged layer.

 

(b)  Locking particles. To form an elastic and mechanically robust shell, the particles must be locked in the interface. This results in an intact capsule that can withstand mechanical forces. One way to obtain such elastic shell is to sinter the particles in place. Sintering is a thermally activated process in which the surface of particles melts and connects them to each other. Upon this local melting, the interstices among particles begin to shrink. With longer sintering times, it is possible to completely block the interstices, which results in very tough capsules with extremely high rupture points.  In this study, particles with 5 minutes of sintering yielded a 150 nm interstices size, and with 20 minutes, almost all the holes were blocked. By using particles with different melting temperatures, the sintering temperature can be adjusted over a wide range; this might be advantageous for encapsulants incompatible with elevated temperatures. Other ways of locking particles are electrostatic particle packing and packing via van der Waals forces. In the former case, for instance, a polyelectrolyte of opposite charge can be used to interact with several particles to lock them in place. In the latter case, for the van der Waals force to be effective, the steric repulsions and barrier must be destroyed so the surface molecules can get close enough for the London forces [1] to be strong.

 

After the Colloidosomes are formed, through gentle centrifuging, the fluid interface can be removed by exchanging the external fluid with one that is miscible with the liquid inside the colloidosome. In this step, having a robust shell to withstand shear forces crossing the water-oil interface is very important. This process ensures that the pores in the elastic shell control the permeability by allowing exchange by diffusion across the colloidosome shell. Now, with these steps and knowing parameters such as surface chemistry and locking condition, a promising system with characteristic permeability or cargo release strategies can be designed.

 

Tuning Capsule Properties; Permeation and Release

The most important feature of a colloidosome, as a promising encapsulant, is the versatility of permeation of the shell and or the release mechanisms. Sustained release can be obtained via passive diffusion of cargo via interstices that can be tuned via particle size and the locking procedure. With the mechanical properties of capsules optimized, shear forces can be used as an alternative release mechanism. For instance, minimally sintered polystyrene particles of 60 microns in diameter have shown to rupture in stresses that can be tuned by sintering time over a factor of 10. What makes the colloidosomes even more interesting is that one can choose different particles, with different chemistry, to have an auxiliary response, such as swelling, and dissolving of particular particles in response to the medium. It is also conceivable if one coats the colloidosome with the second layer of particles or polymers to improve or sophisticate the colloidosomes response. The latter can also mitigate the effects of any defect in the colloidosome lattice.

        With this unique platform, Dinsmore and colleagues stepped into the new realm of encapsulating materials of all kind. From therapeutic cargos to bioreactors, the chemical flexibility and even the ease of post-modification would expand the cargo type beyond molecules. For example, the authors show that living cells can be encapsulated in colloidosomes. Well, you may wonder, WHY? Imagine a protective shell around cells that keep them out of the reach of hostile microorganisms without compromising the cell’s vital activities such as nutrient trafficking and cell-to-cell crosstalk. 

[1]  London forces arise when the close proximity of two molecules polarizes both molecules. The resultant dipole work as a magnet to glue molecules together. Therefore, London forces are universal forces (and part of van der Waals forces), which takes effect when atoms or molecules are very close to each other.